Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inova Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inova Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources appear to be press releases or mentions of this company as a supplier for Biotechnology Innovation Organization. PGWG (talk) 04:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND and fail the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 13:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as ordinary sales marketing press releases repurposed as news articles which is an instant factor of deletion, which is not what we consider significance. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 16:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.